There is a YouTuber and an arm chair philosopher (literally not figuratively–he’s literally a trained philosopher that talks about philosophy from the comfort of an armchair) by the name of Ozzymandias Ramses II that is as keen and sharp as they come.
In this video he deals with a common objection raised by religious apologists who like to claim that science rests on the fallacy of Affirming the Consequent. I know that it doesn’t, but it’s hard to put it as succinctly and as beautifully clear as Ozzy does.
His explanation also helps clear up the distinction between modus ponens and modus tollens, which is one of the first things I learned about when studying modal logic.
So, I hope those who are concerned with rationality and being better critical thinkers will take a look at this video, because it’s highly rational, informative, and helps clarify a few key concepts in philosophy that are beneficial for those of us who like to engage in the Great Debate(TM).